Pathos is what the writings survive and thrive, so Swift starts his proposal. In the first lines of the humble proposal, he presents a melancholic image to his readers, recalling beggars and envy of Irish doors, and women after three, four or six children. The first paragraph also includes the core of logical and ethical arguments that mentions alamiznes as a social evil, presumably because of the practice of killing some rich people who "intervened" and the nonpatriotic practice of leaving Ireland for the English enemy. Then he rehearses the emotions of the audience, preparing their own nest for the later stimulus, and says that anyone who offers a cheap and easy solution to this dilemma must build a statue in his honor
. , the author becomes more ethical. Given the concept of Ethos as "the nature and definition of community," Swift's reference to substituting young boys and girls for cattle is a place in a humble proposal that forms the ethical part of the argument. This allows Swift to mention what he sees as a truly outrageous idea that his acquaintance, the real lover of the country, loves others in the caste of others. The guy's solution is to replace the deer young boys and girls over fourteen. Obviously, swiftly implanted into the face, Swift has rightly criticized such an idea, citing the fact that the children of these children would be hard and sincere and therefore unacceptable to such sophisticated scents. Let Swift be so cautious about the taste and sensitivity of people who are unique in Ireland, such as the highly esteemed ladies who are so deserving of the patriot.
But the idea is reversed as the author nicely sums up the values and ethics of the community, which, in the face of women's breeding potential, is a loss to the public. It continues the energies and sensitivity of the conscientious people who unjustly believe they are brutally opposed to the practice. This has always been Swift's personal opinion, so his ideas are in line with community ethics. In your view, there are obviously other unethical practices and flooding them. He says Swift continues to pick up the idea, declaring that his friend has received a Formosa named man who says that any of the riffraffs in his country are, for whatever reason, given to Quality Persons as their primary delicacies. Swift also looks at this theory, of course, keeping in mind the economic interests of the communities, and then allowing the girls to eat without a Groat without the Fortune, is not necessarily a bad idea. The Kingdom would not be worse. He says:
As for the logical considerations of Modest Proposal, their appeal to the cause refers to the itemized list with the presence of too many papists. Logic claims that it poses a threat to the country, year after year, increasingly to their kind, their ominous political commitment, and their loyalty to the Catholic Church through the tenth, of which, of course, did not come to Rev. Swift's Sunday Collector's Basket
. Secondly, more logically, the proposal would give the poor things that they have no experience, that is, their own money and thus the actual payout of their rent! This can also be seen as an appeal to logos or scrapers, as landowners, as they have some emotions themselves, are likely to be reluctant to leave their non-paying customers. The tenants' idea of course allows landlords to raise their rent, so it's a good idea since maize and cattle have been seized. Obviously, Swift gives some relentless, thus unethical behavior to landlords whose pen was a favorite. The statement, however, seems perfectly logical and unfounded. He says:
Third, in the line of logical arguments, he again focuses on public spending. Since spending so high that it keeps the poor unlucky children, why not use the proposal not only for enriching Ireland, but also because the country lacks something in its own industry? The irony is rich; Swift leads the discussion of financial matters and cold, hard economic issues directly to new meals and restaurant concepts. Of course, the only person who benefits, the (thinly veiled) English aristocracy, the lords of the Kingdom of Fortune, who obviously have no food but enough imagination to make new recipes
Fourth, and perhaps the most logical argument for their very poor, the so-called permanent breeders. Swift introduces the argument, assuming they understand the necessity of their proposal. Think about it, as this idea has rooted, you get rid of the pregnancy that these children are adults when they reach one year. Plus, you'll get eight shillings a year! Who can deny this logic? Obviously, Mr. Swift does not pay much attention to the Irish peasant, even though it seems to include them in his great system. This is perhaps the way in which the writings were handled by another oppressive unit, the English government through the water.
Fifth, returning to the culinary point of view, referring to the opportunity for rich people to eat, which perhaps the winemakers may still have a higher price for scalp. So not only did Swift make a logical appeal to patriots, religious and wealthy, but to extend the proposal to the audience and even to the beggars. How to put it away? Requests.
Source by sbobet